Here is the story of Brownback Puppeteer, a piece I created in collaboration with Erika Nelson for the exhibit Art Lives!, coordinated by Rachel Epp Buller of the Feminist Art Project. The exhibit opens on March 30, 2012, at CityArts in Wichita.
Women artists from across Kansas were paired with each other to make both individual and collaborative artwork addressing the theme “Art Lives!” in light of the elimination of the Kansas Arts Commission.
Here is the process of how Erika and I made Brownback Puppeteer. We wrote an artist statement about the piece, trading our writing back and forth to work on in the same way that we worked on the piece itself. Erika begins:
Stage 1 – Erika:
In the collaborative project and exhibition “Art Lives!,†created in response to the cut in Arts funding in the state of Kansas and the elimination of a nationally recognized arts organization, Lora Jost and I have been exchanging two pieces via mail to work on together. These two pieces, Art Lives! and Brownback Puppeteer, reflect two sides to the concept – the politics behind the frustration of the arts community, and the resilience of Art itself.
Brownback Puppeteer started as a simple set of portraits of Gov. Sam Brownback, gleaned from publicly available press photos. The original thought was one of political cartooning, akin to the sort of editorial cartoons that have peppered the conversation on the media front. This was a new realm for both Lora and me, and the collaborative voice changed and evolved through the discussion, reflecting both the urban(ish) and rural impact of Brownback’s policies and actions.
Stage 2 – Lora:
When I received the two portraits of Governor Brownback from Erika, I was perplexed about what to add next. Artists have been satirizing political figures since classical Greece if not since the earliest cave paintings, and given these portraits in this context I had a feeling that our collaboration would go in the direction of satire as well.
I wasn’t a political cartoonist but still I decided to add a cartoon bubble to the governor on the left (that’s how I oriented the two pieces) with him asking, “Art?! What is it good for?!†Maybe the question would read as incredulous on his part but also as a real question I was putting out there to be answered; a question for Erika.
The text that I added to the second portrait is based on a refrigerator magnet that my artist-brother gave to me many years ago that read, “Art can’t hurt you.†I had always read this statement with a certain irony, and it seemed an interesting backdrop from which to view Governor Brownback’s elimination of the KAC. I have always assumed that Governor Brownback was comfortable eliminating arts funding because he didn’t think that the arts community could hurt him politically. So I changed the text in this piece to read, “Art Can’t Hurt Me,†to represent Governor Brownback’s arrogance towards the arts community, first firing the entire staff of the KAC and then line-item-vetoing the organization’s entire budget.
Stage 3 – Erika:
When I got the Brownbacks back with text, I was happy to see the pointed, yet upbeat turn. I didn’t want to demonize BB, but create some sort of commentary on the policies enacted and their effects on the art world in Kansas. Since there were two panels, with two possibilities for related yet complimentary messages, I decided to add both the activist reaction to policies, as well as the continued growth of the Arts in Kansas.
For one, I added a painted paper silhouette scene from one of the Arts rallies held at the Capitol. It was such a powerful coming together of the arts, pleading and empowering the Arts community, I chose some of the messages from the many voices represented. A John Brown that would give hugs for arts, a “Here’s My 29 Cents†illustrating the cost to taxpayers for supporting the Kansas Arts Commission, and an Arts = Business were just a few of the sentiments of the day. I also added string images to Brownback’s hands, opening the question of “who pulls the strings?â€Â For the other panel, I originally envisioned a massive swirl of arts coming up to confront the BB image, but downscaled the addition to a Meadowlark, elevated via tornado to BB’s eye level, singing out for the Arts of Kansas.
Stage 4 – Lora:
As a response to the question “what is art good for,†Erika had painted such a nice protest scene around one of the images of Brownback that I felt that this image was almost complete. And yet there were those silly strings to contend with, and so I decided to do something with them. I tried to use them to illustrate the idea that Brownback appears to be responding not to what ordinary Kansans want but to particular interest groups that are far more ideologically extreme than most Kansans. The Governor’s elimination of the KAC is but one example; rather than responding to ordinary Kansans, many of whom support the KAC, Brownback’s decision to eliminate the agency reflected more the kind of views of the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), a right-wing interest group. I decided to include the logos of five of these sorts of organizations that have ties to Governor Brownback, and to illustrate these connections I attached real strings stretching from the organizations’ logos to Brownback’s hands. As I considered these organizations, I was struck that many of them are considered secretive: ALEC, the Koch brothers, the Fellowship, and Opus Dei. Perhaps the Tea Party, that I also included, is less so. I was curious what Erika would think of these additions.
I didn’t know what to do with the other Brownback image. Erika’s little tornado headed up by a meadowlark was curious indeed, and beyond imagining it kicking dirt into the Governor’s face — which seemed a little mean and not something that nice Kansas meadowlarks would do — I didn’t know what to do with the image. So I added something silly. I shrunk Erika’s drawing of Brownback and gave him the outfit of a stereotypical French artist along with a bad French accent. This was a response to an interview that I had heard in which Governor Brownback was asked, in light of the elimination of the KAC, what he would do to help artists. He said that he’d like to promote art that is based on the Flint Hills in relation to tourism. As an artist who doesn’t paint landscapes, my response was, “Are you kidding?â€Â Without knocking Flint Hills Art (which I greatly enjoy), it seemed to me that this was a pretty narrow range of art. Governor Brownback as a French “arteest†who “lervs the Fleent Heels†evolved into a paper doll. With it I was thinking about what happens when art is subsumed into the commercial realm, which is where I fear that art is headed in Kansas if Brownback has his way. (Brownback paper dolls available for $9.99, outfits sold separately!)
Stage 5 – Erika:
At this point, the artists received an email regarding the show. The gist was that overtly political works may be pulled, which sorta’ threw both of us for a loop. However, in a phone conversation discussing how the pieces should wrap up, we decided not to censor ourselves. When I saw the whimsical additions from Stage 4, I felt pretty good about the collaboration, and the gentle poking that resulted from the exchange. Yes, they are important issues, and yes, the pieces were coming from a place of frustration, but the work evolved into a piece of questioning, rather than demonizing.
Lora added logos to the strings on one hand, leaving the others open to my input. I agreed with the choices, so simply mounted the pieces so that the operators could act on both hands. Suddenly, everything clicked – the paper doll, the puppet, even the puppet-like or paper-doll-like cutouts of the protestors. I composed a set of questions, mounting them with the two Brownback boards, on a background of a Kansas roadmap. The strings, the roadways, the cutouts, the acts on paper, coalesced.
Finally, I thought it’d be a nice gesture to include an Artist Approved Self-Censoring shade, if the piece was still deemed too controversial or pointed for display. I mounted a pull-down shade on the top of the piece, which can be pulled down over the imagery, revealing a large red “CENSORED†stamp applied to the shade.
Note – Lora: While the threat of censorship caused quite a kerfuffle among the participating artists, we are pleased that CityArts of Wichita (a publicly-funded arts center) made no real attempt to take any work out of the show, ultimately honoring their First Amendment obligation not to censor the works on the basis of content or viewpoint.